OVER 1,100 AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD INDUSTRY ORGANIZATIONS CALL ON HOUSE TO PASS BIPARTISAN BIOTECH LABELING SOLUTION THIS WEEK

July 11, 2016

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Claire Parker
202.677.7699
press@cfsaf.org 
July 11, 2016

Today, more than 1,100 agriculture, food and business organizations and companies representing the entire U.S. food supply chain from farm to fork sent a letter to House leadership calling on them to pass this week the agricultural biotechnology solution that was approved 63-30 by the Senate with broad bipartisan support.

The letter, addressed to Speaker Ryan, Minority Leader Pelosi, Majority Leader McCarthy, and Minority Whip Hoyer, calls for expedited consideration and the scheduling of floor time this week to ensure this bipartisan proposal receives passage before Congress adjourns for the summer recess.

“The issue of biotech disclosure is one of the most significant issues that the agriculture and food industry has faced in recent years. The U.S. agriculture and food industry creates over 17 million jobs, representing nearly 1 in 10 jobs,” the letter states. “This very system—which produces the most abundant, the highest quality, and the most affordable food in the world—will be threatened with large economic costs without a national uniform solution on this issue…. We strongly support S. 764 and ask that you schedule floor time and provide expedited consideration of this important and timely legislation. We pledge to work with Members on both sides of the aisle to ensure quick passage of this bipartisan proposal.”

This urgently needed legislation would prevent a costly patchwork of state labeling laws that directly impact American family farmers, small businesses and consumers, while providing shoppers access to more product information than ever before. The impacts of Vermont’s law, which took effect on July 1, are already being felt as consumers are facing increasingly empty shelves in the state. Unless the House acts this week, consumers, farmers and businesses in other states could feel the consequences of lost sales in Vermont, which ultimately could lead to lost jobs.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *